Structural complexity in forests improves carbon capture

Scientists find that eastern U.S. forest complexity improves carbon capture

October 9, 2019

Forests in the eastern United States that are structurally complex — the arrangement of vegetation is varied throughout the physical space — sequester more carbon, according to a new study in Ecology, a journal of the Ecological Society of America.

The study, by researchers at the University of Connecticut, Virginia Commonwealth University and Purdue University, demonstrates for the first time that a forest’s structural complexity is a better predictor of carbon sequestration potential than tree species diversity. The research was funded by NSF’s Division of Emerging Frontiers.

“Now there is a recognition of the importance of how the leaf area is arrayed in three dimensions,” says study author Robert Fahey, a forest ecologist at UConn. “The variability of the arrangement of the leaf area in the canopy can be important in terms of forest productivity as well as resilience to different types of disturbances and stressors.”

Understanding how forest structure drives carbon sequestration is important for ecologists, climate modelers and forest managers, who are working on ways to mitigate climate change, says Fahey.

Why are structurally complex forests better at carbon sequestration? Co-author Chris Gough of Virginia Commonwealth University suggests that multiple layers of leaves may optimize how efficiently light is used to power carbon sequestration in wood.

To conduct the study, the researchers used a combination of their own data, as well as data from the National Ecological Observatory Network, funded by NSF. NEON is generating long-term, publicly available data for ecosystems in the U.S., with the aim of understanding decades-long ecological processes.

“These results are the tip of the iceberg,” says Dan Gruner, a program director in NSF’s Division of Environmental Biology. “NEON freely provides such data to the public and sponsors workshops to train more users in their analysis.”

— 
NSF Public Affairs,

(703) 292-7090 media@nsf.gov